Defining a shared lead in partnerships: A shared lead needs a clear customer need matching the receiving partner’s offer.; The receiving team must have a defined acceptance rule with minimum context and exclusions.; Agree on criteria before exchanging enquiries to avoid misaligned expectations.
Image: Partnership Marketing Desk

Lead Sharing

Part of Partner lead sharing and routing

Agreeing on what qualifies as a shared lead

Agree a shared-lead definition with clear eligibility, exclusions, submission evidence and acceptance decisions.

A shared lead is an identified customer need that fits the receiving partner’s offer and meets an acceptance rule both teams can apply. Agree the rule before exchanging enquiries. A campaign interaction, familiar company name or attractive account does not qualify on its own.

Regulatory & Industry Insights on Lead Sharing

  • Privacy ComplianceUnder APP 6 (OAIC), use/disclosure of personal info requires consent or legal basis
  • ACCC OversightACCC examining unsolicited selling and lead generation practices
  • National Agreement FocusClosing the Gap priority area includes improving data sharing in public services

Start with the receiving team’s decision

Ask what the receiving team needs to decide whether it can help and who should respond. Its rule may require a stated problem, a relevant organisation and contact role, and enough context to understand the proposed next step. If timing matters, ask what is known; an exploratory question need not have a firm purchase date.

Keep eligibility separate from priority. A valid enquiry may be low priority. An urgent request may belong in support rather than the lead queue.

Write an acceptance rule

DecisionAgreement to record
Customer needWhich requests or identified needs fit the receiving offer?
RecipientWhich partner can assess or answer the need?
Minimum contextWhat is needed for a useful first response?
ExclusionsWhich requests belong to support, an existing project or neither partner?
Submission evidenceWhat prompted the proposed handoff?

A person asking Partner A to introduce them to Partner B about a named service may meet the lead definition, subject to the transfer check. A download of a joint guide shows interest in that guide; it is not automatically a request for sales contact.

The partners can agree other qualifying signals, but should state them and assess permission to use or disclose details separately.

These are suggested operating rules, not a universal definition of a qualified lead.

Test uncertain cases

Put a few hypothetical enquiries through the rule. Does a current customer’s technical question belong in support? Is there a new need when both partners already speak with the same organisation? Is the need clear but the proposed transfer still unassessed?

If reviewers disagree, clarify the definition or name an exception owner. Keep a case pending when context is missing instead of forcing it into an accepted or declined category.

Confirm acceptance

Have the receiving team mark a submission accepted, returned for clarification or declined, with a brief reason. Retain the original submission and response so repeated gaps can be fixed.

Acceptance should name the next action: answer through the referring team, contact the person where appropriate or arrange the requested joint conversation. It does not establish that an opportunity exists, that a referral caused a sale or that either partner has earned commercial credit.

More from Lead Sharing

Lead Sharing

Resolving disputes about partner opportunity credit

Review partner opportunity credit disputes against the agreed rule, dated evidence and a recorded decision.